WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: DBL(0()) -> c() DBL(s(z0)) -> c1(DBL(z0)) DBLS(cons(z0,z1)) -> c3(DBL(z0)) DBLS(cons(z0,z1)) -> c4(DBLS(z1)) DBLS(nil()) -> c2() FROM(z0) -> c10(FROM(s(z0))) INDX(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> c8(SEL(z0,z2)) INDX(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> c9(INDX(z1,z2)) INDX(nil(),z0) -> c7() SEL(0(),cons(z0,z1)) -> c5() SEL(s(z0),cons(z1,z2)) -> c6(SEL(z0,z2)) - Weak TRS: dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(z0)) -> s(s(dbl(z0))) dbls(cons(z0,z1)) -> cons(dbl(z0),dbls(z1)) dbls(nil()) -> nil() from(z0) -> cons(z0,from(s(z0))) indx(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> cons(sel(z0,z2),indx(z1,z2)) indx(nil(),z0) -> nil() sel(0(),cons(z0,z1)) -> z0 sel(s(z0),cons(z1,z2)) -> sel(z0,z2) - Signature: {DBL/1,DBLS/1,FROM/1,INDX/2,SEL/2,dbl/1,dbls/1,from/1,indx/2,sel/2} / {0/0,c/0,c1/1,c10/1,c2/0,c3/1,c4/1 ,c5/0,c6/1,c7/0,c8/1,c9/1,cons/2,nil/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {DBL,DBLS,FROM,INDX,SEL,dbl,dbls,from,indx ,sel} and constructors {0,c,c1,c10,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7,c8,c9,cons,nil,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: DBL(0()) -> c() DBL(s(z0)) -> c1(DBL(z0)) DBLS(cons(z0,z1)) -> c3(DBL(z0)) DBLS(cons(z0,z1)) -> c4(DBLS(z1)) DBLS(nil()) -> c2() FROM(z0) -> c10(FROM(s(z0))) INDX(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> c8(SEL(z0,z2)) INDX(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> c9(INDX(z1,z2)) INDX(nil(),z0) -> c7() SEL(0(),cons(z0,z1)) -> c5() SEL(s(z0),cons(z1,z2)) -> c6(SEL(z0,z2)) - Weak TRS: dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(z0)) -> s(s(dbl(z0))) dbls(cons(z0,z1)) -> cons(dbl(z0),dbls(z1)) dbls(nil()) -> nil() from(z0) -> cons(z0,from(s(z0))) indx(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> cons(sel(z0,z2),indx(z1,z2)) indx(nil(),z0) -> nil() sel(0(),cons(z0,z1)) -> z0 sel(s(z0),cons(z1,z2)) -> sel(z0,z2) - Signature: {DBL/1,DBLS/1,FROM/1,INDX/2,SEL/2,dbl/1,dbls/1,from/1,indx/2,sel/2} / {0/0,c/0,c1/1,c10/1,c2/0,c3/1,c4/1 ,c5/0,c6/1,c7/0,c8/1,c9/1,cons/2,nil/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {DBL,DBLS,FROM,INDX,SEL,dbl,dbls,from,indx ,sel} and constructors {0,c,c1,c10,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7,c8,c9,cons,nil,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 3: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: DBL(0()) -> c() DBL(s(z0)) -> c1(DBL(z0)) DBLS(cons(z0,z1)) -> c3(DBL(z0)) DBLS(cons(z0,z1)) -> c4(DBLS(z1)) DBLS(nil()) -> c2() FROM(z0) -> c10(FROM(s(z0))) INDX(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> c8(SEL(z0,z2)) INDX(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> c9(INDX(z1,z2)) INDX(nil(),z0) -> c7() SEL(0(),cons(z0,z1)) -> c5() SEL(s(z0),cons(z1,z2)) -> c6(SEL(z0,z2)) - Weak TRS: dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(z0)) -> s(s(dbl(z0))) dbls(cons(z0,z1)) -> cons(dbl(z0),dbls(z1)) dbls(nil()) -> nil() from(z0) -> cons(z0,from(s(z0))) indx(cons(z0,z1),z2) -> cons(sel(z0,z2),indx(z1,z2)) indx(nil(),z0) -> nil() sel(0(),cons(z0,z1)) -> z0 sel(s(z0),cons(z1,z2)) -> sel(z0,z2) - Signature: {DBL/1,DBLS/1,FROM/1,INDX/2,SEL/2,dbl/1,dbls/1,from/1,indx/2,sel/2} / {0/0,c/0,c1/1,c10/1,c2/0,c3/1,c4/1 ,c5/0,c6/1,c7/0,c8/1,c9/1,cons/2,nil/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {DBL,DBLS,FROM,INDX,SEL,dbl,dbls,from,indx ,sel} and constructors {0,c,c1,c10,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7,c8,c9,cons,nil,s} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: DBL(x){x -> s(x)} = DBL(s(x)) ->^+ c1(DBL(x)) = C[DBL(x) = DBL(x){}] WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)