WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.trs # AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxRelTRS (1) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1065 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) TRS for Loop Detection (5) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 9 ms] (6) BEST (7) proven lower bound (8) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (9) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (10) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: LT(0, s(z0)) -> c LT(z0, 0) -> c1 LT(s(z0), s(z1)) -> c2(LT(z0, z1)) FIBO(0) -> c3(FIB(0)) FIBO(s(0)) -> c4(FIB(s(0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c5(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(s(z0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c6(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(z0)) FIB(0) -> c7 FIB(s(0)) -> c8 FIB(s(s(z0))) -> c9(IF(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0)) IF(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c10(IF(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0), LT(s(z0), s(s(z1)))) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c11(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z2)) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c12(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z3)) SUM(z0, 0) -> c13 SUM(z0, s(z1)) -> c14(SUM(z0, z1)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: lt(0, s(z0)) -> true lt(z0, 0) -> false lt(s(z0), s(z1)) -> lt(z0, z1) fibo(0) -> fib(0) fibo(s(0)) -> fib(s(0)) fibo(s(s(z0))) -> sum(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)) fib(0) -> s(0) fib(s(0)) -> s(0) fib(s(s(z0))) -> if(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0) if(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> if(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0) if(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> sum(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)) sum(z0, 0) -> z0 sum(z0, s(z1)) -> s(sum(z0, z1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID)) proved innermost termination of relative rules ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: LT(0, s(z0)) -> c LT(z0, 0) -> c1 LT(s(z0), s(z1)) -> c2(LT(z0, z1)) FIBO(0) -> c3(FIB(0)) FIBO(s(0)) -> c4(FIB(s(0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c5(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(s(z0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c6(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(z0)) FIB(0) -> c7 FIB(s(0)) -> c8 FIB(s(s(z0))) -> c9(IF(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0)) IF(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c10(IF(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0), LT(s(z0), s(s(z1)))) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c11(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z2)) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c12(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z3)) SUM(z0, 0) -> c13 SUM(z0, s(z1)) -> c14(SUM(z0, z1)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: lt(0, s(z0)) -> true lt(z0, 0) -> false lt(s(z0), s(z1)) -> lt(z0, z1) fibo(0) -> fib(0) fibo(s(0)) -> fib(s(0)) fibo(s(s(z0))) -> sum(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)) fib(0) -> s(0) fib(s(0)) -> s(0) fib(s(s(z0))) -> if(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0) if(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> if(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0) if(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> sum(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)) sum(z0, 0) -> z0 sum(z0, s(z1)) -> s(sum(z0, z1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: LT(0, s(z0)) -> c LT(z0, 0) -> c1 LT(s(z0), s(z1)) -> c2(LT(z0, z1)) FIBO(0) -> c3(FIB(0)) FIBO(s(0)) -> c4(FIB(s(0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c5(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(s(z0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c6(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(z0)) FIB(0) -> c7 FIB(s(0)) -> c8 FIB(s(s(z0))) -> c9(IF(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0)) IF(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c10(IF(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0), LT(s(z0), s(s(z1)))) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c11(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z2)) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c12(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z3)) SUM(z0, 0) -> c13 SUM(z0, s(z1)) -> c14(SUM(z0, z1)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: lt(0, s(z0)) -> true lt(z0, 0) -> false lt(s(z0), s(z1)) -> lt(z0, z1) fibo(0) -> fib(0) fibo(s(0)) -> fib(s(0)) fibo(s(s(z0))) -> sum(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)) fib(0) -> s(0) fib(s(0)) -> s(0) fib(s(s(z0))) -> if(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0) if(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> if(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0) if(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> sum(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)) sum(z0, 0) -> z0 sum(z0, s(z1)) -> s(sum(z0, z1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (5) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence SUM(z0, s(z1)) ->^+ c14(SUM(z0, z1)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. The pumping substitution is [z1 / s(z1)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (6) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (7) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: LT(0, s(z0)) -> c LT(z0, 0) -> c1 LT(s(z0), s(z1)) -> c2(LT(z0, z1)) FIBO(0) -> c3(FIB(0)) FIBO(s(0)) -> c4(FIB(s(0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c5(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(s(z0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c6(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(z0)) FIB(0) -> c7 FIB(s(0)) -> c8 FIB(s(s(z0))) -> c9(IF(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0)) IF(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c10(IF(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0), LT(s(z0), s(s(z1)))) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c11(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z2)) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c12(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z3)) SUM(z0, 0) -> c13 SUM(z0, s(z1)) -> c14(SUM(z0, z1)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: lt(0, s(z0)) -> true lt(z0, 0) -> false lt(s(z0), s(z1)) -> lt(z0, z1) fibo(0) -> fib(0) fibo(s(0)) -> fib(s(0)) fibo(s(s(z0))) -> sum(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)) fib(0) -> s(0) fib(s(0)) -> s(0) fib(s(s(z0))) -> if(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0) if(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> if(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0) if(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> sum(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)) sum(z0, 0) -> z0 sum(z0, s(z1)) -> s(sum(z0, z1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (8) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) Propagated lower bound. ---------------------------------------- (9) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: LT(0, s(z0)) -> c LT(z0, 0) -> c1 LT(s(z0), s(z1)) -> c2(LT(z0, z1)) FIBO(0) -> c3(FIB(0)) FIBO(s(0)) -> c4(FIB(s(0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c5(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(s(z0))) FIBO(s(s(z0))) -> c6(SUM(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)), FIBO(z0)) FIB(0) -> c7 FIB(s(0)) -> c8 FIB(s(s(z0))) -> c9(IF(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0)) IF(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c10(IF(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0), LT(s(z0), s(s(z1)))) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c11(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z2)) IF(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> c12(SUM(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)), FIBO(z3)) SUM(z0, 0) -> c13 SUM(z0, s(z1)) -> c14(SUM(z0, z1)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: lt(0, s(z0)) -> true lt(z0, 0) -> false lt(s(z0), s(z1)) -> lt(z0, z1) fibo(0) -> fib(0) fibo(s(0)) -> fib(s(0)) fibo(s(s(z0))) -> sum(fibo(s(z0)), fibo(z0)) fib(0) -> s(0) fib(s(0)) -> s(0) fib(s(s(z0))) -> if(true, 0, s(s(z0)), 0, 0) if(true, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> if(lt(s(z0), s(s(z1))), s(z0), s(s(z1)), z3, z0) if(false, z0, s(s(z1)), z2, z3) -> sum(fibo(z2), fibo(z3)) sum(z0, 0) -> z0 sum(z0, s(z1)) -> s(sum(z0, z1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST