WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
proof of input_sXUihC0AZk.trs
# AProVE Commit ID: 5b976082cb74a395683ed8cc7acf94bd611ab29f fuhs 20230524 unpublished


The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1).

(0) CpxTRS
(1) NarrowingOnBasicTermsTerminatesProof [FINISHED, 0 ms]
(2) BOUNDS(1, 1)


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   gcd(x, 0) -> x
   gcd(0, y) -> y
   gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> if(<(x, y), gcd(s(x), -(y, x)), gcd(-(x, y), s(y)))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: PARALLEL_INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(1) NarrowingOnBasicTermsTerminatesProof (FINISHED)
Constant runtime complexity proven by termination of constructor-based narrowing.

The maximal most general narrowing sequences give rise to the following rewrite sequences:

gcd(s(x0), s(x1)) ->^* if(<(x0, x1), gcd(s(x0), -(x1, x0)), gcd(-(x0, x1), s(x1)))




----------------------------------------

(2)
BOUNDS(1, 1)