MAYBE
proof of input_J3lD99CKpX.trs
# AProVE Commit ID: aff8ecad908e01718a4c36e68d2e55d5e0f16e15 fuhs 20220216 unpublished


The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).

(0) CpxTRS
(1) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(2) CpxTRS
(3) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(4) CpxTRS
(5) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(6) CpxWeightedTrs
    (7) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (8) CpxTypedWeightedTrs
    (9) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
    (10) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs
        (11) NarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
        (12) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs
        (13) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
        (14) CpxRNTS
        (15) SimplificationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
        (16) CpxRNTS
        (17) CpxRntsAnalysisOrderProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
        (18) CpxRNTS
        (19) ResultPropagationProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
        (20) CpxRNTS
        (21) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 867 ms]
        (22) CpxRNTS
        (23) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 187 ms]
        (24) CpxRNTS
    (25) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
    (26) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs
        (27) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
        (28) CpxRNTS
(29) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(30) CdtProblem
    (31) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (32) CdtProblem
    (33) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (34) CdtProblem
    (35) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^1)), 52 ms]
    (36) CdtProblem
    (37) CdtInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (38) CdtProblem
    (39) CdtInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (40) CdtProblem
    (41) CdtForwardInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (42) CdtProblem
    (43) CdtForwardInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (44) CdtProblem


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
   after(0, XS) -> XS
   after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: PARALLEL_INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(1) RenamingProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
   after(0', XS) -> XS
   after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: PARALLEL_INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(3) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
transformed relative TRS to TRS
----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
   after(0, XS) -> XS
   after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: PARALLEL_INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(5) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
Transformed relative TRS to weighted TRS
----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxWeightedTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) [1]
   after(0, XS) -> XS [1]
   after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS) [1]

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(7) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Infered types.
----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS with Types.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) [1]
   after(0, XS) -> XS [1]
   after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS) [1]

The TRS has the following type information:
from :: s:0 -> cons
cons :: s:0 -> cons -> cons
s :: s:0 -> s:0
after :: s:0 -> cons -> cons
0 :: s:0

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(9) CompletionProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
The transformation into a RNTS is sound, since:

(a) The obligation is a constructor system where every type has a constant constructor,

(b) The following defined symbols do not have to be completely defined, as they can never occur inside other defined symbols:

   from_1
   after_2

(c) The following functions are completely defined:
none

Due to the following rules being added:
none

And the following fresh constants:    const

----------------------------------------

(10)
Obligation:
Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS where critical functions are completely defined. The underlying TRS is:

Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS with Types.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) [1]
   after(0, XS) -> XS [1]
   after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS) [1]

The TRS has the following type information:
from :: s:0 -> cons
cons :: s:0 -> cons -> cons
s :: s:0 -> s:0
after :: s:0 -> cons -> cons
0 :: s:0
const :: cons

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(11) NarrowingProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Narrowed the inner basic terms of all right-hand sides by a single narrowing step.
----------------------------------------

(12)
Obligation:
Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS where critical functions are completely defined. The underlying TRS is:

Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS with Types.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) [1]
   after(0, XS) -> XS [1]
   after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS) [1]

The TRS has the following type information:
from :: s:0 -> cons
cons :: s:0 -> cons -> cons
s :: s:0 -> s:0
after :: s:0 -> cons -> cons
0 :: s:0
const :: cons

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(13) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
Transformed the TRS into an over-approximating RNTS by (improved) Size Abstraction.
The constant constructors are abstracted as follows:

   0 => 0
   const => 0

----------------------------------------

(14)
Obligation:
Complexity RNTS consisting of the following rules:

   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> XS :|: z' = XS, z = 0, XS >= 0
   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> after(N, XS) :|: z = 1 + N, z' = 1 + X + XS, X >= 0, XS >= 0, N >= 0
   from(z) -{ 1 }-> 1 + X + from(1 + X) :|: X >= 0, z = X


----------------------------------------

(15) SimplificationProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Simplified the RNTS by moving equalities from the constraints into the right-hand sides.
----------------------------------------

(16)
Obligation:
Complexity RNTS consisting of the following rules:

   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> z' :|: z = 0, z' >= 0
   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> after(z - 1, XS) :|: z' = 1 + X + XS, X >= 0, XS >= 0, z - 1 >= 0
   from(z) -{ 1 }-> 1 + z + from(1 + z) :|: z >= 0


----------------------------------------

(17) CpxRntsAnalysisOrderProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Found the following analysis order by SCC decomposition:

   { from }
   { after }

----------------------------------------

(18)
Obligation:
Complexity RNTS consisting of the following rules:

   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> z' :|: z = 0, z' >= 0
   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> after(z - 1, XS) :|: z' = 1 + X + XS, X >= 0, XS >= 0, z - 1 >= 0
   from(z) -{ 1 }-> 1 + z + from(1 + z) :|: z >= 0

Function symbols to be analyzed: {from}, {after}

----------------------------------------

(19) ResultPropagationProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
Applied inner abstraction using the recently inferred runtime/size bounds where possible.
----------------------------------------

(20)
Obligation:
Complexity RNTS consisting of the following rules:

   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> z' :|: z = 0, z' >= 0
   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> after(z - 1, XS) :|: z' = 1 + X + XS, X >= 0, XS >= 0, z - 1 >= 0
   from(z) -{ 1 }-> 1 + z + from(1 + z) :|: z >= 0

Function symbols to be analyzed: {from}, {after}

----------------------------------------

(21) IntTrsBoundProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))

Computed SIZE bound using CoFloCo for: from
after applying outer abstraction to obtain an ITS,
resulting in: O(1) with polynomial bound: 0

----------------------------------------

(22)
Obligation:
Complexity RNTS consisting of the following rules:

   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> z' :|: z = 0, z' >= 0
   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> after(z - 1, XS) :|: z' = 1 + X + XS, X >= 0, XS >= 0, z - 1 >= 0
   from(z) -{ 1 }-> 1 + z + from(1 + z) :|: z >= 0

Function symbols to be analyzed: {from}, {after}
Previous analysis results are:
  from: runtime: ?, size: O(1) [0]

----------------------------------------

(23) IntTrsBoundProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))

Computed RUNTIME bound using CoFloCo for: from
after applying outer abstraction to obtain an ITS,
resulting in: INF with polynomial bound: ?

----------------------------------------

(24)
Obligation:
Complexity RNTS consisting of the following rules:

   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> z' :|: z = 0, z' >= 0
   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> after(z - 1, XS) :|: z' = 1 + X + XS, X >= 0, XS >= 0, z - 1 >= 0
   from(z) -{ 1 }-> 1 + z + from(1 + z) :|: z >= 0

Function symbols to be analyzed: {from}, {after}
Previous analysis results are:
  from: runtime: INF, size: O(1) [0]

----------------------------------------

(25) CompletionProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
The TRS is a completely defined constructor system, as every type has a constant constructor and the following rules were added:

   after(v0, v1) -> null_after [0]

And the following fresh constants:    null_after

----------------------------------------

(26)
Obligation:
Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS where all functions are completely defined. The underlying TRS is:

Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS with Types.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) [1]
   after(0, XS) -> XS [1]
   after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS) [1]
   after(v0, v1) -> null_after [0]

The TRS has the following type information:
from :: s:0 -> cons:null_after
cons :: s:0 -> cons:null_after -> cons:null_after
s :: s:0 -> s:0
after :: s:0 -> cons:null_after -> cons:null_after
0 :: s:0
null_after :: cons:null_after

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(27) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
Transformed the TRS into an over-approximating RNTS by (improved) Size Abstraction.
The constant constructors are abstracted as follows:

   0 => 0
   null_after => 0

----------------------------------------

(28)
Obligation:
Complexity RNTS consisting of the following rules:

   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> XS :|: z' = XS, z = 0, XS >= 0
   after(z, z') -{ 1 }-> after(N, XS) :|: z = 1 + N, z' = 1 + X + XS, X >= 0, XS >= 0, N >= 0
   after(z, z') -{ 0 }-> 0 :|: v0 >= 0, v1 >= 0, z = v0, z' = v1
   from(z) -{ 1 }-> 1 + X + from(1 + X) :|: X >= 0, z = X

Only complete derivations are relevant for the runtime complexity.

----------------------------------------

(29) CpxTrsToCdtProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
Converted Cpx (relative) TRS with rewrite strategy PARALLEL_INNERMOST to CDT
----------------------------------------

(30)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:
   from(z0) -> cons(z0, from(s(z0)))
   after(0, z0) -> z0
   after(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> after(z0, z2)
Tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
   AFTER(0, z0) -> c1
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
S tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
   AFTER(0, z0) -> c1
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:   from_1, after_2

Defined Pair Symbols:   FROM_1, AFTER_2

Compound Symbols:   c_1, c1, c2_1


----------------------------------------

(31) CdtLeafRemovalProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Removed 1 trailing nodes:
   AFTER(0, z0) -> c1

----------------------------------------

(32)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:
   from(z0) -> cons(z0, from(s(z0)))
   after(0, z0) -> z0
   after(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> after(z0, z2)
Tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
S tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:   from_1, after_2

Defined Pair Symbols:   FROM_1, AFTER_2

Compound Symbols:   c_1, c2_1


----------------------------------------

(33) CdtUsableRulesProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
The following rules are not usable and were removed:
   from(z0) -> cons(z0, from(s(z0)))
   after(0, z0) -> z0
   after(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> after(z0, z2)

----------------------------------------

(34)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:none
Tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
S tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:none

Defined Pair Symbols:   FROM_1, AFTER_2

Compound Symbols:   c_1, c2_1


----------------------------------------

(35) CdtRuleRemovalProof (UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^1)))
Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
We considered the (Usable) Rules:none
And the Tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
The order we found is given by the following interpretation:

Polynomial interpretation :

   POL(AFTER(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2
   POL(FROM(x_1)) = x_1
   POL(c(x_1)) = x_1
   POL(c2(x_1)) = x_1
   POL(cons(x_1, x_2)) = [1] + x_2
   POL(s(x_1)) = x_1

----------------------------------------

(36)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:none
Tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
S tuples:
   FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0)))
K tuples:
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
Defined Rule Symbols:none

Defined Pair Symbols:   FROM_1, AFTER_2

Compound Symbols:   c_1, c2_1


----------------------------------------

(37) CdtInstantiationProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Use instantiation to replace FROM(z0) -> c(FROM(s(z0))) by 
   FROM(s(x0)) -> c(FROM(s(s(x0))))

----------------------------------------

(38)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:none
Tuples:
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
   FROM(s(x0)) -> c(FROM(s(s(x0))))
S tuples:
   FROM(s(x0)) -> c(FROM(s(s(x0))))
K tuples:
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
Defined Rule Symbols:none

Defined Pair Symbols:   AFTER_2, FROM_1

Compound Symbols:   c2_1, c_1


----------------------------------------

(39) CdtInstantiationProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Use instantiation to replace FROM(s(x0)) -> c(FROM(s(s(x0)))) by 
   FROM(s(s(x0))) -> c(FROM(s(s(s(x0)))))

----------------------------------------

(40)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:none
Tuples:
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
   FROM(s(s(x0))) -> c(FROM(s(s(s(x0)))))
S tuples:
   FROM(s(s(x0))) -> c(FROM(s(s(s(x0)))))
K tuples:
   AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2))
Defined Rule Symbols:none

Defined Pair Symbols:   AFTER_2, FROM_1

Compound Symbols:   c2_1, c_1


----------------------------------------

(41) CdtForwardInstantiationProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Use forward instantiation to replace AFTER(s(z0), cons(z1, z2)) -> c2(AFTER(z0, z2)) by 
   AFTER(s(s(y0)), cons(z1, cons(y1, y2))) -> c2(AFTER(s(y0), cons(y1, y2)))

----------------------------------------

(42)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:none
Tuples:
   FROM(s(s(x0))) -> c(FROM(s(s(s(x0)))))
   AFTER(s(s(y0)), cons(z1, cons(y1, y2))) -> c2(AFTER(s(y0), cons(y1, y2)))
S tuples:
   FROM(s(s(x0))) -> c(FROM(s(s(s(x0)))))
K tuples:
   AFTER(s(s(y0)), cons(z1, cons(y1, y2))) -> c2(AFTER(s(y0), cons(y1, y2)))
Defined Rule Symbols:none

Defined Pair Symbols:   FROM_1, AFTER_2

Compound Symbols:   c_1, c2_1


----------------------------------------

(43) CdtForwardInstantiationProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Use forward instantiation to replace AFTER(s(s(y0)), cons(z1, cons(y1, y2))) -> c2(AFTER(s(y0), cons(y1, y2))) by 
   AFTER(s(s(s(y0))), cons(z1, cons(z2, cons(y2, y3)))) -> c2(AFTER(s(s(y0)), cons(z2, cons(y2, y3))))

----------------------------------------

(44)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:none
Tuples:
   FROM(s(s(x0))) -> c(FROM(s(s(s(x0)))))
   AFTER(s(s(s(y0))), cons(z1, cons(z2, cons(y2, y3)))) -> c2(AFTER(s(s(y0)), cons(z2, cons(y2, y3))))
S tuples:
   FROM(s(s(x0))) -> c(FROM(s(s(s(x0)))))
K tuples:
   AFTER(s(s(s(y0))), cons(z1, cons(z2, cons(y2, y3)))) -> c2(AFTER(s(s(y0)), cons(z2, cons(y2, y3))))
Defined Rule Symbols:none

Defined Pair Symbols:   FROM_1, AFTER_2

Compound Symbols:   c_1, c2_1