WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
proof of input_ksCDUJ5Ycx.trs
# AProVE Commit ID: aff8ecad908e01718a4c36e68d2e55d5e0f16e15 fuhs 20220216 unpublished


The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).

(0) CpxTRS
(1) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(2) CdtProblem
(3) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(4) CdtProblem
(5) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(6) CdtProblem
(7) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(8) CdtProblem
(9) CdtToCpxRelTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(10) CpxTRS
(11) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(12) CpxTRS
(13) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof [FINISHED, 3 ms]
(14) BOUNDS(1, n^1)


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   f(0) -> 1
   f(s(x)) -> g(f(x))
   g(x) -> +(x, s(x))
   f(s(x)) -> +(f(x), s(f(x)))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: PARALLEL_INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(1) CpxTrsToCdtProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
Converted Cpx (relative) TRS with rewrite strategy PARALLEL_INNERMOST to CDT
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:
   f(0) -> 1
   f(s(z0)) -> g(f(z0))
   f(s(z0)) -> +(f(z0), s(f(z0)))
   g(z0) -> +(z0, s(z0))
Tuples:
   F(0) -> c
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(G(f(z0)), F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
   G(z0) -> c4
S tuples:
   F(0) -> c
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(G(f(z0)), F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
   G(z0) -> c4
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:   f_1, g_1

Defined Pair Symbols:   F_1, G_1

Compound Symbols:   c, c1_2, c2_1, c3_1, c4


----------------------------------------

(3) CdtLeafRemovalProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Removed 2 trailing nodes:
   F(0) -> c
   G(z0) -> c4

----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:
   f(0) -> 1
   f(s(z0)) -> g(f(z0))
   f(s(z0)) -> +(f(z0), s(f(z0)))
   g(z0) -> +(z0, s(z0))
Tuples:
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(G(f(z0)), F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
S tuples:
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(G(f(z0)), F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:   f_1, g_1

Defined Pair Symbols:   F_1

Compound Symbols:   c1_2, c2_1, c3_1


----------------------------------------

(5) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Removed 1 trailing tuple parts
----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:
   f(0) -> 1
   f(s(z0)) -> g(f(z0))
   f(s(z0)) -> +(f(z0), s(f(z0)))
   g(z0) -> +(z0, s(z0))
Tuples:
   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(F(z0))
S tuples:
   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(F(z0))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:   f_1, g_1

Defined Pair Symbols:   F_1

Compound Symbols:   c2_1, c3_1, c1_1


----------------------------------------

(7) CdtUsableRulesProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
The following rules are not usable and were removed:
   f(0) -> 1
   f(s(z0)) -> g(f(z0))
   f(s(z0)) -> +(f(z0), s(f(z0)))
   g(z0) -> +(z0, s(z0))

----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem

Rules:none
Tuples:
   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(F(z0))
S tuples:
   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(F(z0))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:none

Defined Pair Symbols:   F_1

Compound Symbols:   c2_1, c3_1, c1_1


----------------------------------------

(9) CdtToCpxRelTrsProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
Converted S to standard rules, and D \ S as well as R to relative rules.
----------------------------------------

(10)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(F(z0))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(11) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
transformed relative TRS to TRS
----------------------------------------

(12)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   F(s(z0)) -> c2(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c3(F(z0))
   F(s(z0)) -> c1(F(z0))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(13) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (FINISHED)
A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 1. 
The certificate found is represented by the following graph.

"[49, 50, 51, 52, 53]
{(49,50,[F_1|0]), (49,51,[c2_1|1]), (49,52,[c3_1|1]), (49,53,[c1_1|1]), (50,50,[s_1|0, c2_1|0, c3_1|0, c1_1|0]), (51,50,[F_1|1]), (51,51,[c2_1|1]), (51,52,[c3_1|1]), (51,53,[c1_1|1]), (52,50,[F_1|1]), (52,51,[c2_1|1]), (52,52,[c3_1|1]), (52,53,[c1_1|1]), (53,50,[F_1|1]), (53,51,[c2_1|1]), (53,52,[c3_1|1]), (53,53,[c1_1|1])}"
----------------------------------------

(14)
BOUNDS(1, n^1)