WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
proof of input_J0lbdFqxKN.trs
# AProVE Commit ID: aff8ecad908e01718a4c36e68d2e55d5e0f16e15 fuhs 20220216 unpublished


The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1).

(0) CpxTRS
(1) NarrowingOnBasicTermsTerminatesProof [FINISHED, 0 ms]
(2) BOUNDS(1, 1)


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (parallel-innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   d(x) -> e(u(x))
   d(u(x)) -> c(x)
   c(u(x)) -> b(x)
   v(e(x)) -> x
   b(u(x)) -> a(e(x))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: PARALLEL_INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(1) NarrowingOnBasicTermsTerminatesProof (FINISHED)
Constant runtime complexity proven by termination of constructor-based narrowing.

The maximal most general narrowing sequences give rise to the following rewrite sequences:

b(u(x0)) ->^* a(e(x0))

v(x0) ->^* v(x0)

c(u(u(x0))) ->^* a(e(x0))

d(u(u(u(x0)))) ->^* a(e(x0))

d(x0) ->^* e(u(x0))




----------------------------------------

(2)
BOUNDS(1, 1)