/bin/sh: line 1: 32770 Quit                    (core dumped) z3 -T:14.25 -smt2 /tmp/SMTP32646-66 > /tmp/SMTS32646-67
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
* Step 1: Sum.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
    + Details:
        ()
** Step 1.a:1: Sum.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
    + Details:
        ()
*** Step 1.a:1.a:1: Ara.  MAYBE
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False}
    + Details:
        Signatures used:
        ----------------
          F (TrsFun "f") :: ["A"(1)] -(0)-> "A"(0)
          F (TrsFun "g") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1)
          F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0)
        
        
        Cost-free Signatures used:
        --------------------------
        
        
        
        Base Constructor Signatures used:
        ---------------------------------
        
        
        
        Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as:
        -------------------------------------------
        1. Strict:
          f(g(X)) -> f(X)
          main(x1) -> f(x1)
        2. Weak:
          
        

*** Step 1.a:1.b:1: DecreasingLoops.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10}
    + Details:
        The system has following decreasing Loops:
          f(x){x -> g(x)} =
            f(g(x)) ->^+ f(x)
              = C[f(x) = f(x){}]

** Step 1.b:1: NaturalPI.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules}
    + Details:
        We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear):
        The following argument positions are considered usable:
          none
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          {f}
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
          p(f) = 4 + x1
          p(g) = 2 + x1
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        f(g(X)) = 6 + X
                > 4 + X
                = f(X) 
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        
** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor.  WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))